Assessment of Load Response in Interlocking Concrete Block Pavements By ANSYS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17213732Keywords:
Interlocking Concrete Block Paving, Equivalent Elastic Modulus, Finite Element Method, Herringbone patternAbstract
Concrete Block Pavement (CBP) consists of discrete masonry units arranged in engineered patterns, unlike monolithic concrete or asphalt surfaces. Because load paths are transferred through interlocking blocks, bedding, and joints, overall structural stiffness depends on block shape, thickness, and the laying pattern, making a single elastic modulus difficult to define. This study develops a practical deflection‑prediction model for CBP using dynamic plate load tests combined with Finite Element Method (FEM) analysis. We propose a procedure to estimate the Equivalent Elastic Modulus (EEM) of an Equivalent Block Layer (EBL)—a composite representation of blocks and bedding sand—calibrated to measured surface deflections. Results indicate that properly compacted jointing sand can reduce peak pavement deflection by as much as 30%. Additional reductions are achieved by increasing block thickness, using larger loading plate diameters, and providing thicker, well‑graded sub‑bases that limit shear deformation. Among common laying patterns, the herringbone bond offers the most efficient load dispersion due to multidirectional interlock; basket‑weave performs moderately; stretcher bond shows the least effectiveness under dynamic loading. FEM simulations in Ansys reproduced the measured deflections with good fidelity, matching manual calculations of approximately 8 mm and thereby validating the modelling approach. The framework offers practitioners a rational way to select block geometry, pattern, and layer thicknesses to meet serviceability targets while optimizing material use. The methodology can support maintenance planning and lifecycle cost evaluation.
Downloads
References
Barber, S. D., & Knapton, J. (1980). An experimental investigation of the behaviour of a concrete block pavement with a sand sub base. Institution of Civil Engineers, 69(1), 139–155.
Concrete Manufacturing Association. (2004). Concrete block paving: Book 1, 2, 3, 4. Concrete Manufacturing Association.
Gunarathna, W. P. H. (2011). Finite element model approach to determine an effective layout and suppport conditions for concrete block paving.
Gunatilake, D. V., & Mampearachchi, W. K. (2014). Development of a finite element model for concrete block paving. In Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pacific Conference on Transportation and the Environment (APTE 2014) (pp. 44–53). Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Hassani, A., & Jamshidi, A. (2006). Modeling and structural design of a concrete block pavement system. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving (pp. 389–398). San Francisco, CA.
Jacobs, M. J., & Houben, L. J. (1988). Wheel track testing and finite element analysis of concrete block pavement. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Concrete Block Paving (pp. 102–113). Rome, Italy: Pavitalia.
Knapton, J. (1976). The design of concrete block roads (Technical Rep. 42.515). Cement and Concrete Association.
Lin, W., Cho, Y. H., & Kim, I. (2016). Development of deflection prediction model for concrete block pavement considering the block shapes and construction patterns. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering.
Lin, W., Ryu, S., Hao, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2016). Development of a horizontal shifting mechanistic empirical prediction model for concrete block pavement. Construction and Building Materials, 118, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.124
Mampearachchi, W., & Gunarathna, W. (2010). Finite element model approach to determine support conditions and effective layout for concrete block paving. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22(11), 1139–1147.
Mampearachchi, W. K., & Gunatilake, M. (2013). A sustainable road construction material for low volume roads. In Proceedings of the FARU International Research Symposium (pp. 7–18).
Mampearachchi, W. K., & Senadeera, A. (2014). Determination of the most effective cement concrete block laying pattern and shape for road pavement based on field performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 26(2), 226–232.
Miura, Y., Takaura, M., & Tsuda, T. (1984). Structural design of concrete block pavements by CBR method and its evaluation. In Conference on Concrete Block Paving (pp. 152–157). Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Nejad, F. (2003). Finite element analysis on concrete block paving. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving. Sun City, South Africa: Document Transformation Technology.
Nejad, F., & Shadravan, M. (2006). A study on behaviour of block pavement using 3D finite element method. In Proceedings of the San Francisco International Conference on Concrete Block Paving (pp. 349–358). San Francisco, CA.
