Energy and Momentum Correction Coefficients in Meandering Channels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17178364Keywords:
Hydraulic modelling, Mean velocity, Meandering flows, Open-channel flowAbstract
Understanding flow behaviour in meandering channels is essential due to their complex velocity distribution influenced by centrifugal forces. Unlike straight channels, meandering flows exhibit lateral variations in velocity and associated energy losses, necessitating correction factors such as the kinetic energy correction coefficient (α) and the momentum correction coefficient (β). This study investigates these coefficients in a highly sinuous meandering channel (sinuosity 4.1) under varying discharge conditions and surface roughness (smooth and rough). Velocity measurements were obtained using Pitot tubes across multiple cross-sections along the meander path. The results reveal significant lateral variation in depth-averaged velocities and the correction coefficients, highlighting the influence of channel roughness and discharge on the distribution of α and β. Comparative analysis between smooth and rough channels shows higher energy and momentum correction coefficients in smooth conditions, attributed to reduced turbulence and frictional effects. These findings contribute to a better understanding of flow mechanics in natural and engineered meandering systems, aiding in more accurate hydraulic modelling and design.
Downloads
References
Al-Khatib, I. A. (1999). Momentum and kinetic energy coefficients in symmetrical rectangular compound cross-section flumes.
Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill.
Esposito, M., Sánchez, A. G., Bel, J., & Ruiz, A. N. (2024). Evolution mapping – II. Describing statistics of the non-linear cosmic velocity field. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 534(4), 3906–3915. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2351
Jin, Y.-C., Zarrati, A. R., & Zheng, Y. (2004). Boundary shear distribution in straight ducts and open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(9), 924–928. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2004)130:9(924)
Keulegan, G. H. (1938). Laws of turbulent flow in open channels. National Bureau of Standards, U.S.
Leopold, L. B. (1960). Flow resistance in sinuous or irregular channels. U.S. Government Printing Office.
Pradhan, A., & Khatua, K. K. (2018a). Assessment of roughness coefficient for meandering compound channels. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(5), 2010–2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1818-9
Pradhan, A., & Khatua, K. K. (2018b). Gene expression programming to predict Manning’s n in meandering flows. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 45(4), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2017-0460
Vatanchi, S. M., & Maghrebi, M. F. (2024a). Calibration and uncertainty analysis for isovel contours-based stage-discharge rating curve by sequential uncertainty fitting (SUFI-2) method. Water Resources Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-04039-9
Vatanchi, S. M., & Maghrebi, M. F. (2024b). Hysteresis-influenced stage-discharge rating curve based on isovel contours and Jones formula. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 38(7), 2829–2840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02716-0
Zarrati, A. R., Tamai, N., & Jin, Y.-C. (2005). Mathematical modeling of meandering channels with a generalized depth averaged model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131(6), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:6(467)
