The Science Behind Push–Pull Cropping System

Authors

  • Debanjan Guchhait M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India
  • Masina Sairam Center of Excellence for Smart Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology Management, Odisha, 761211, India
  • Sumit Ray M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India
  • Lalichetti Sagar M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India
  • Shaik Rishitha M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India
  • Bisruti Maity M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India
  • Sagar Maitra M. S. Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Odisha, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22048761

Keywords:

Push-pull technology, Integrated pest management, Repellent intercrop-trap crop system, Sustainable agriculture, Semi chemical-mediated pest control

Abstract

The push-pull cropping system is one of the most successful examples of ecological pest management, yet it remains underrated in many parts of the world. It is an agro-ecological pest management strategy that combines a repellent intercrop named “Push crop” with an attractant trap crop “Pull crop”, planted around and within a main cereal field. This system effectively exploits the nature of plants and insects to find hosts and mates. It diverts stem-borer moths, fall armyworms and any other lepidopteran pests away from the main economic crop while suppressing parasitic weeds such as Striga. Along with pest management, the push-pull cropping system also contributes to improving soil fertility and generating livestock fodder while reducing chemical inputs in crop management. After being developed in East Africa, it is now being adapted for different crops, such as maize, sorghum, and rice, across several countries. Thus, the push-pull cropping systems offer the marginal farmers a low-cost, low-toxicity yet effective alternative to synthetic pesticides. It also contributes to climate-smart and sustainable agriculture. Further, this cropping system can be intercropped with modern breeding, precision agriculture and biological control management for enhancing environmental conservation. It also aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by reducing the dependency of chemical inputs.

References

Abate, M., Atnafu, G., Alemu, B., Alameneh, Y., Molla, A., Tadesse, M., & Gebremariam, G. (2024). Evaluation of push-pull technology for pest and soil fertility management on maize in north western Ethiopia. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 19(2), 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijagro.2024.100012

Arvadiya, L., Gudadhe, N. N., Garde, Y., Desai, L., Patel, P., Usadadiya, V., & Virdia, H. (2025). Purpose-wise diversification of component crops in rice-based cropping systems for enhancing productivity, soil health, income, family and livestock nutrition. European Journal of Agronomy, 168, 127635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127635

Da Silva, V. F., Santos, A. D., Silveira, L. C. P., Tomazella, V. B., & Ferraz, R. M. (2021). Push-pull cropping system reduces pests and promotes the abundance and richness of natural enemies in brassica vegetable crops. Biological Control, 166, 104832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104832

Erdei, A. L., David, A. B., Savvidou, E. C., Džemedžionaitė, V., Chakravarthy, A., Molnár, B. P., & Dekker, T. (2024). The push–pull intercrop Desmodium does not repel, but intercepts and kills pests. Elife, 13, e88695. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88695

Guera, O. G. M., Castrejón-Ayala, F., Robledo, N., Jiménez-Pérez, A., Sánchez-Rivera, G., Salazar-Marcial, L., & Flores Moctezuma, H. E. (2021). Effectiveness of push–pull systems to fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) management in maize crops in Morelos, Mexico. Insects, 12(4), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12040298

Maitra, S., Ray, S., Suman, S., Pushpa, K., Divya, B. S., Sairam, M., & Hossain, A. (2026a). Evaluating the intercropping systems in the context of agroecological resilience in the current era of the changing climate: A scenario of scientific analysis of last decade data. Climate Resilience and Sustainability, 5(1), e70050. https://doi.org/10.1002/cli2.70050

Maitra, S., Sain, S., Sairam, M., Shankar, T., Ray, S., Banerjee, M., & Malik, G. C. (2024). Impact of Rabi maize-legume intercropping system on growth, yield and crop competition in maize. Research on Crops, 25(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2024.ROC-1093

Mulupi, D., Kiprono, C., Ng’ong’a, E., Oliech, W., Aila, F., Ombok, B., & Odhiambo, G. (2023). Promoting Conservation Agriculture through Push-Pull Technology as an Agroecological Transition. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4413772

Mumo, C. K., Muturi, P. W., & Gichimu, B. M. (2024). A Modified Climate‐Smart Push‐Pull Technology for the Management of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in the Semiarid Lands of Kenya. International Journal of Agronomy, 2024(1), 8038142. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8038142

Mutyambai, D. M., Mutua, J. M., Kessler, A., Jalloh, A. A., Njiru, B. N., Chidawanyika, F., Dubois, T., Khan, Z., Mohamed, S., Niassy, S., & Subramanian, S. (2023). Push-pull cropping system soil legacy alter maize metabolism and fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance through tritrophic interactions. Plant and Soil, 498(1–2), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06467-9

Ndayisaba, P. C., Kuyah, S., Midega, C. a. O., Mwangi, P. N., & Khan, Z. R. (2020). Push-pull technology improves maize grain yield and total aboveground biomass in maize-based systems in Western Kenya. Field Crops Research, 256, 107911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107911

Nori, M., Masina, S., Sagar, M., Sumit, R., Hemasree, K. R., Roman Kumar, M., ... & Rajesh Shriram, K. (2025). Influence of precision nitrogen management in Rabi maize and cow pea intercropping system under varied planting proportions in south Odisha. Plant Science Today, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.8194

Ouya, F. O., Murage, A. W., Pittchar, J. O., Chidawanyika, F., Pickett, J. A., & Khan, Z. R. (2023). Impacts of climate-resilient push–pull technology on farmers’ income in selected counties in Kenya and Tanzania: propensity score matching approach. Agriculture & Food Security, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-023-00418-4

Priya, G. S., Maitra, S., Sairam, M., & Ray, S. (2025). Spatial arrangement in pearl millet-groundnut intercropping system influences productivity, competition and economics. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 47, 108-19. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2025.v47.009

Ray, S., Maitra, S., Sairam, M., Sameer, S., Sagar, L., Divya, B., & Gitari, H. I. (2025a). The nexus between intercropping systems, ecosystem services and sustainable agriculture: A review. Research on Crops, 25, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31830/2348-7542.2025.ROC-1166

Ray, S., Maitra, S., Sairam, M., & Lalichetti, S. (2025b). Impact of maize-groundnut intercropping system on growth and yield as influenced by phosphorus, potassium and sulphur fertilisation. Crop Res, 60, 308-316. https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2025.CR-1054

Sileshi, G. W., Kuyah, S., Schuman, M. C., Chidawanyika, F., Muriithi, B. W., Midega, C. a. O., Olagoke, A., Otim, M. H., Mafongoya, P. L., & Martin, E. A. (2025). Opportunities for expansion of push-pull technology as an agroecological and sustainable intensification approach in Africa. Npj Sustainable Agriculture, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-025-00069-x

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21

How to Cite

Guchhait, D., Sairam, M., Ray, S., Sagar, L., Rishitha, S., Maity, B., & Maitra, S. (2026). The Science Behind Push–Pull Cropping System. NG Agriculture Insights, 2(S1), 124-128. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22048761

Similar Articles

1-10 of 116

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.